On a complex project, every technical interface has a relationship behind it, between the two people who own it. That relationship is rarely anyone's job to manage.
Example project, hypothetical
Read as relationships, 10 are strong, 3 strained, 1 weak and 2 not yet formed.
Automation → Electrical
Choose an interface in the drawing or with the arrows.
Technical interface management identifies the dependencies between systems, registers them and tracks each one until it is closed. What it rarely manages is the relationship between the two people who own each interface, and that relationship affects whether the technical interface is resolved properly and in time.
Human Interface Management (HIM) is the deliberate management of that relationship. Managed together with the technical side, it forms Integrated Interface Management (IIM). The model behind it, N² + H, adds two human layers beneath each cell of the N² matrix: the owners on each side and the state of the relationship between them.
The bottom layer is read through five factors. Each has early warning signs that can be observed long before a deliverable is missed.
The Missing Interface: Why Complex Projects Fail Where Nobody Is Looking
Andersen, D. S. (2026). The Missing Interface: Why Complex Projects Fail Where Nobody Is Looking (Version 1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23426161
The full discipline, with its methods and tools, is set out in a forthcoming book, The Missing Interface.
If no email window opened, send an email to contact@
This opens an email to contact@
Danni Søndergaard Andersen is an engineer and discipline leader in energy, infrastructure and complex project delivery. ORCID: 0009-0002-0281-7797.